Residents' Comments

1:Additional expense for all, Encourage Street parking, find alternative places for shopping. - (Resident) R

2: Against - (Resident) D B

3: Against car parking charges. - (Resident) Mrs G M  F

4: Against charges - (Resident) Mrs B

5: Against charges - (Resident) P P

6: Against charges - will cause congestion - (Resident) l  Z

7 Against charges. - (Resident) Mr J A

8: Against charges.  People will park on the road causing congestion.  I am more likely not to use Cranbrook shops with specialist shops closing.  - (Resident) Mrs M  S

9:  Against parking charges - (Resident) C M  D

10:  Against proposal - no off street parking for many residents - (Resident) J P

11: Against proposed car parking charges. - (Resident) Mrs G

12:  Agree with Parish Council proposal to fight the charges. - (Resident) Mrs J W

13:  All pensioners are totally against car parking charges in Cranbrook.  People will be  totally against - (Resident) Mr P & Mrs E H

14:  All the people from adjacent villages will go to alternative shopping venues.  A very silly idea when businesses are all struggling. - (Resident) J H D  N

15:  Am opposed to car parking charges.  It will not help the local businesses at all. - (Resident) N  A

16:  Anti charging but perhaps time restricted in some places. - (Resident) Mr R & Mrs M G

17:  appalled that TWBC did not have courtesy to advise of their intention. Vehemently opposed, should have staff reductions or pay cuts at TWBC  - (Resident) G P

18:  As a frequent shopper in Cranbrook, I am totally opposed to the charges for parking.  These will have a serious effect  on the already struggling shoppers in this town. - (Resident) John

19:  As a parent with children at Cranbrook School, I use the car parks on a daily basis to shop prior to pick up directly at the front of the School. - (Resident) H R B

20:  as a pensioner, It will be the end of owning a car due to extra expense. Also shopkeepers are struggling to survive  -I've lived here 83 years and seen many  shops shut. - (Resident) E R

21:  As a resident I deplore the possibility of charges 1: It will make the town less attractive to shoppers. 2: It will force one flow parking outside streets causing congestion. -  (Resident) Mr B B

22:  As a resident I often have a problem trying to park outside my own house in the High Street and could not afford to pay charges on a daily basis.  Shops will suffer greatly. - (Resident) Mr M R L

23:  As a Tanyard resident, there is no unrestricted street parking nearby.  Elderly neighbours and young children would be disadvantaged.  Pay and Display would compromise success of local businesses.  - (Resident) Mrs L L

24:  As a user the family will be more inclined to shop in Tenterden where there is more variety of shops and better supermarkets. - (Resident) P & J  M

25:  As an employee of a Cranbrook business I would be unable to continue working in Cranbrook as parking charges would severely affect my income. - (Resident) W B

26:  as householders in Cranbrook, with no place for a car, we are being penalised for our lack of facilities. We are being picked on. People will stop coming to Cranbrook. Parking at Tesco in Tenterden is free for 2 hours - (Resident) M S

27:  As OAPs we are completely against car parking charges at Cranbrook.  Any imposed charges will not be spent for benefit of Cranbrook and Sissinghurst Parish. - (Resident) M W

28:  As residents of Cranbrook, my wife and I are very much opposed to a scheme that charges for car parking. - (Resident) Dr F R & Mrs M B

29:  At 07:30, 43 residents parked in Tanyard  - No alternative- enables elderly to live independently - will compromise business viability - residents keep the centre attractive to visit - (Resident) L and D L

30:  Bad idea.  Shops already struggling.  Free parking attracts visitors. - (Resident) Mrs D S

31:  Being a student I would not be able to afford costs for parking as it would be on a daily basis. - (Resident) S M

32:  Car parking charges should not be a blanket charge.  Free for first 2-4 hours. - (Resident) Mr T D

33:  Car parking charges will only serve to decrease even further trade and visitors to the town.  Residents since 1968.  We are appalled by the news. - (Resident) Mr D & Mrs A S

34:  Car parking charges will totally kill off Cranbrook.  People will go to Tunbridge Wells or Maidstone.  My daughter works there for a low wage - how can she afford car parking charges?  Bus service arrives after 9 and leaves before 5pm.  Public transport is not suitable.  More unemployment and Cranbrook will die.  - (Resident) Mrs J M

35:  Car parking charges would take business away from Cranbrook.  Neighbouring roads would be plagued with motorists unwilling to pay the charges - a recipe for danger and havoc. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs G

36:  Catastrophic as a disabled pensioner with double yellow lines outside my house.  I have to use car parks. - (Resident) Mrs R S

37:  Chaos in housing avenues and side streets.  Do not destroy this lovely little town with a crude attempt to get revenue for the County at the expense of the Parish. - (Resident) M & B M

38:  Charges in the 3 car parks will be a dissuading factor in nipping into the town for small items and shoppers will go to Tenterden and Budgens to avoid payment.  We hate paying charges.  The small businesses will miss out more, with more unused shops. - (Resident) Adrian

39:  Charges should be refundable as in Waitrose, Tenterden.  Short term FREE PARKING must remain available otherwise footfall will be reduced.  Need car park for visitors. - (Resident) J D B

40:  Charges will clog up estate roads.  Huge detrimental effect on businesses.  We support Cranbrook's butchers and the local shops.  If charging we will go to Biddenden. - (Resident) E S R

41:  Charges would be a disaster for the Town.  Traders are struggling.  Interesting gift shops need help to survive.  Supermarket has no competition. - (Resident) G and G P

42:  Charging for car parking would damage the trade and tourist trade.  I would not come into Cranbrook to shop if I had to pay to park. - (Resident) Gordon H

43:  Cranbrook business will be dramatically affected creating a downturn in people willing to park in the town and dangerous driving conditions near schools - (Resident) J H

44:  Cranbrook is a small town relying on local people from surrounding areas.  Workers would suffer more.  Congestion in residential roads with school children, could be dangerous. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs E

45:  Cranbrook residents will find roads clogged up with people parking.  Small retailers and businesses forced to close, the character and economy will be ruined. - (Resident) R J & M J M

46:  Cranbrook Town, with interesting history, encourages shoppers and visitors.  Charging would be a retrograde step and detrimental effect on businesses and pleasurable activities.  - (Resident) Mrs N S  B

47:  Cranbrook uniquely placed to retain its Wealden character market town atmosphere.  If it loses its free parking it will lose this advantage.  It is the place to "pop into" daily. - (Resident) H T

48:  Cranbrook will be destroyed.  The struggling small businesses particularly.  People will stay away and for those who have to work, the proposed fee is outrageous.  - (Resident) Mrs R  M

49:  Death Knell of local trade - lack of places during day for residents with permits - (Resident) A B

50:  Definitely against the proposal.  Free parking encourages non-residents to visit Cranbrook. - (Resident) Mrs J W

51:  Definitely no. - (Resident) J F P

52:  Definitely not.  Tunbridge Wells once again has it in for us.  It will be the elderly and handicapped parents of small children who will suffer most. - (Resident) Mrs P D

53:  Definitely should be opposed.  If anything more spaces should be provided to encourage trade into the town. - (Resident) D W

54:  detrimental to wellbeing of Cranbrook - no consultation. Where will money go ? Badly affect the town in ways TWBC are blind to  - (Resident) A  W

55:  disagree - AFFECT TOWNS TRADE, AND CONGESTED  SIDE ROADS - (Resident) O S

56:  Disagree with proposal - (Resident) P F

57:  disaster for economy of Cranbrook - (Resident) C B

58:  Discourage shoppers /congestion outside car parks / problems for tourists - (Resident) A W

59:  discourage shopping in Cranbrook - free in Tenterden. £900 for residents is not fair - (Resident) B B

60:  diverted to Tenterden causing more retailers to close in Cranbrook.  It will become a ghost town. - (Resident) Mrs D J

61:  DO not agree to charges - (Resident) E A

62:  Does this mean that friends and relatives that come to visit or stay must pay for the privilege.  We live on the High Street.  - (Resident) Mrs L B

63:  don’t agree - it would stop people coming to town - (Resident) J G

64:  Don't let them do this. - (Resident) Mr R M

65:  family lives in Cranbrook) -

66:  First two hours free - (Resident) I J

67:  Free parking is a huge draw to the town for visitors and shoppers.  No to parking charges. - (Resident) Mrs W M M

68:  Free parking is one of the attractions of Cranbrook over Tenterden, not merely for the financial saving.  To avoid extortionate fines, one over-feeds the meter. - (Resident) B S  W

69:  Free parking is one of the attractions.  We would see a reduction in numbers visiting the town.  Another detrimental move by TWBC. - (Resident) Mr B L B

70:  Free parking keeps rural shops and businesses viable in Cranbrook.  It will encourage people to drive to supermarkets with free parking. - (Resident) Mrs J M  N

71:  Frittenden Parish Council.  I am totally opposed to these proposed charges. - (Resident) Mike C

72:  Hard up displaced OAP.  I only have a scooter.  Please don't charge for that. - (Resident) 

73:  I agree with the above proposal to fight the proposition. - (Resident) Mrs B L

74:  I am a pensioner.  I use Cranbrook but I could use Ocado via the Internet, drive to Tenterden or the free parking outlet centres.  Imposing a tax will result in shop closures. - (Resident) Mr J W C

75:  I am against charges.  It will basically affect the shops.  People might  as well go to Maidstone or Tunbridge Wells with a better choice of shops.  - (Resident) Mr D W

76:  I am against charges.  It would be devastating for business also for local community. - (Resident) Mrs B K

77:  I am against the proposal to charge for parking.  It will drive local shop customers away. - (Resident) Mr T  P

78:  I am against these proposed charges as will reduce trade in the town. - (Resident) A R

79:  I am completely against any proposed charges. - (Resident) M J  W

80:  I am dead against parking fees.  We need people to come to our town.  What about Blue Badge holders? - (Resident) Mrs M F

81:  I am elderly, I live on the outskirts and need a car. Charging  me to park is an insult - I am already a council tax payer - (Resident) H F

82:  I am in opposition to the proposal.  It is the good parking that attracts people to Cranbrook.  The very high Council Tax should cover it. - (Resident) Mrs N J W

83:  I am not in favour of parking charges.  The shops are struggling now.  This would mean more people not using them.  We already pay community tax very little is spent in Cranbrook. - (Resident) Mrs F D  L

84:  I am not sure that the footfall would be significantly reduced.  My major concern is that charges will drive people to park on our streets adding to congestion, especially as at present, Primary School creates hold ups. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs P

85:  I am opposed on the grounds that it will knock the heart out of the town at a difficult time economically. - (Resident) S J  H

86:  I am opposed to any charges knowing it will take the life out of Cranbrook.  A lot of us pop in and out for small errands all the time.  I would no longer do this if I had to pay.  - (Resident) S T

87:  I am totally against charges.  I think it will cause a lot of people trying to park on the estate roads, so as not to pay the fees. - (Resident) Mr C K

88:  I am totally opposed to the idea of car parking charges in Cranbrook - (Resident) Mrs J B

89:  I am totally opposed to this idea.  It will have a negative effect.  It will harm trade and reduce the number of visitors.  Please do not drive trade away and make it a ghost town. - (Resident) Tim E

90:  I disagree with it completely.  Charges for non-residents would be far too high for people on low incomes. - (Resident) Mrs C C

91:  I feel that charging will completely kill Cranbrook.  People come here for the individual shops with free parking.  I think all businesses will suffer enormously. - (Resident) G K

92:  I feel the charges will be detrimental to all Cranbrook businesses and residents.  For example visitors and residents would find the cost prohibitive. - (Resident) Mrs E F

93:  I feel the move to pay and display charges will compromise the success of local businesses and that we, the residents  contribute to keeping the town centre an attractive and desirable place to visit and should not be penalised by a desire to raise revenue without considering the consequences of the community.  - (Resident) L L

94:  I have lived here since 1953 and I am opposed to charges.  It will affect the shops and people will go to Tenterden. - (Resident) Mrs P A  B

95:  I live in Hawkhurst and often pop to Cranbrook for shopping.  If I have to pay I will go to Tunbridge Wells where there are more shops. - (Resident) B  C

96:  I live too far away to walk to Cranbrook, if charging I will go to Hawkhurst - (Resident) J W

97:  I lived in Cranbrook for 39 years and still use the doctor, dentist and attend meeting 2 to 3 times in one day.  Shoppers will go to Tenterden and traders will suffer - (Resident) Mrs B B

98:  I object - (Resident) A K

99:  I object in the strongest possible terms.  Free parking encourages people to browse.  People would park in unauthorised places. - (Resident) Mrs M S

100:  I object to charging - (Resident) B P

101:  I object to the proposed introduction of car parking charges as it will adversely affect business. - (Resident) E H

102:  I oppose charges - (Resident) A A

103:  I protest in strongest possible way, the proposed car parking in Cranbrook.  Devastating  effect on economic and social well being of the community.  If TWBC wishes to support these proposals business will drop. - (Resident) J H

104:  I shop in Cranbrook frequently because of free parking.  One of the few towns in this area to offer this.  I hope you will be able to fight this threat. - (Resident) Mrs R S

105:  I strongly disagree with the proposal. - (Resident) L & R N G

106:  I strongly object to car parking charges in Cranbrook car parks - (Resident) S A

107:  I strongly object to charges - (Resident) Mr N

108:  I strongly object to charges at any of the car parks in Cranbrook - (Resident) J H

109:  I strongly object to the proposed car parking charges in Cranbrook.  It is my nearest shopping centre and I use the CO-OP mainly because parking is free.  I also call on other businesses which could be sourced elsewhere if charges are introduced. - (Resident) C H

110:  I strongly oppose charges as they can damage tourism and business in the town by discouraging visitors. - (Resident) Mr G L

111:  I strongly oppose.  Local residents need free parking.  Bad for trade.  Another money grabbing scheme which goes totally against local feeling. - (Resident) G R  P

112:  I think this is very bad news for elderly and out of work.  It is going to cost a lot of money which none of us can afford and we do not want it. - (Resident) Mrs B C

113:  I totally oppose the introduction of car parking charges. - (Resident) S G

114:  I totally oppose this suggested car parking fee.  It would cause great hardship to traders. - (Resident) P & J  E

115: I understand that TWBC is looking at charging in car parks in Cranbrook and you can bet Cranbrook won't see any of the income from it.  Where are the people who live in High Street going to park? They do not have garages and probably won't be able to park in street.  Are they expected to pay or will they be issued with Residential Parking Permits as I have here in Sydney. It seems that TWBC will stop at nothing when it comes to Cranbrook to fill its own coffers without any benefit to Cranbrook and destroying a once thriving area. - Visitor) G J

116:  I use Cranbrook but I could use Ocado via the Internet, drive to Tenterden or the free parking outlet centres.  Imposing a tax will result in shop closures: Mr J W Craig   - (Resident)

117:  I visit daily, and this would make me do business in another way.  No cycle path to Golford or racks in Cranbrook - (Resident) B V

118:  I will be badly affected with no garage.  Tunbridge Wells must agree to building a community centre. - (Resident) Mrs I C

119:  If charges are being levied at the Cranbrook car parks, the businesses will suffer.  If you want to keep shoppers coming to Cranbrook have first hour free then start charging. - (Resident) V

120:  if charges imposed  free parking permits should be given to us residents. - (Resident) D H

121:  If I had to park in Cranbrook for day to day shopping, I would make greater use of the Sissinghurst Village Shop and come to Cranbrook less. - (Resident) A

122: If the proposed charges for car parking take place, this will mean main road in Cranbrook, which is narrow enough.  Many residents park in allocated areas in car park.  Where will they go?  Traffic congestion in side roads will be horrendous.  - (Resident) S & T C

123:  If this proposal goes through we will cease to do any shopping for the first time in 55 years.  The proposal will kill off Cranbrook. - (Resident) Mr E & Mrs S L

124:  If this proposal is ratified it would certainly damage Cranbrook's reputation of an attractive village for shopping and general interest.  Another 'Nail in the Coffin' for the traders. - (Resident) M F H

125: If you want to kill the small shops by charging, you have the recipe.  I live 4 miles from Cranbrook so I can go to Tenterden or Staplehurst.  I never go to Headcorn now.  FREE CAR PARKS KEEP THE TOWN ALIVE.  - (Resident) Mr A L

126:  Ill timed unjustified tax on business in town. Side streets will be clogged. Drive shoppers elsewhere with free parking - (Resident) K W

127:  In today's climate "A death wish" to visitors and subsequently trade. - (Resident) J H & B A  M

128:  Incredible that in different economic climate TWBC want to charge for parking. Already poor infrastructure,  will increase congestion, particularly  for schools. No rural transport other than cars   - (Resident) P S

129:  Is TWBC trying to kill off Cranbrook?  Charges will deter people from shopping in Cranbrook.  They will go to bigger towns.  People who park all night will not be able to afford it or park in the street, which could be dangerous. - (Resident) Mrs T H

130:  It is offensive to impose your will on a community that has functioned and is prospering so well on its own. - (Resident) D m

131:  It is unfair to take money from local residents who come in to do their shopping here.  Our visitors come and are welcomed by free parking.  The town will not flourish. - (Resident) Mrs G M  P

132:  It will destroy the quality of life of residential areas adjacent to the town who will be overcome by the displaced parking.  This is a bad idea from people who do not care. - (Resident) Mr N & Mrs J F

133:  It will discourage us from shopping in Cranbrook and a disastrous decision for your local shops. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs M J

134:  It will result in visiting and local car owners parking in side roads putting residents at risk of accidents and access to their property and damaging road surfaces - (Resident) Mrs J S

135:  It would certainly cut my trips to Cranbrook dramatically - (Resident) Mr & Mrs C G  B

136:  Kill trade in Cranbrook / people will park way up the high st / Coop ? - (Resident) A W

137:  Kill trade in high st, unfair for octogenarian shoppers with no blue badge, charge is a lot for old people, surrounding residential areas will get congested. Need permits for residents, so charges not cost effective - (Resident) M C

138:  Less people visiting Cranbrook and shopping. - (Resident) H E  P

139:  Live in a flat with my Mum.  We have no garage and rely on parking on the Street.  I am a student so not earning any money and paying to park would leave me with less money.  I live here and have the right of free parking.  I am sure you would not want to pay to park at your house. - (Resident) E F B

140:  Living in a flat, I have no garage and rely on parking on the street and on a small income, having to park and pay would be financially hard for me. - (Resident) E F S

141:  Living out midway between Cranbrook and Tenterden, Tenterden will become more attractive due to favourable pricing.  Cranbrook orchestra and musical events have smaller audience and more vulnerable to pricing of parking charges. - (Resident) R G

142: Lots of parents would not use Cranbrook and pay charges.  Car park is never full where would residents and Cranbrook School pupils park?  - (Resident) Mrs R

143:  Make Cranbrook a less attractive place to shop - (Resident) H and R M

144:  Means less people shopping in Cranbrook and more shops having to close. - (Resident) A P

145:  Most definitely opposed to car park charges. - (Resident) M M

146:  Much against this proposal - (Resident) N S

147:  My 80 year old mother regularly drives in and out of town but she could not walk due to a heart condition.  This is a small town on small infrastructure. Charges will be too costly. - (Resident) Mrs B D

148:  My family and I visited Cranbrook for a day with a tourist leaflet.  Delightful Kentish village, easy access and car parking.  This encourages people to use the village facilities rather than larger towns.  Thank you for the Apple Day.  We love to visit these places. - (Resident) S

149:  My position as a volunteer in Cranbrook Oxfam Shop will be threatened.  I give my time as I cannot afford to give money. - (Resident) S D

150:  My sister and late parents live in Cranbrook. No parking for High Street properties except on road or car park. Are they expected to pay for permits? - (Resident) G J

151:  No - you will be taking away trade from Cranbrook - (Resident) Mrs O O

152:  no alternatives for residents - businesses will make their own case - (Resident) I H

153:  no charges - Cranbrook poor relation in TWBC - (Resident) M M

154:  No discussion has been allowed by the Town Hall.  What a democratic disgrace.  Cranbrook needs many people to help it survive economically. - (Resident) A R C  L

155:  No parking charges - (Resident) Mr & Mrs H J  H

156:  No to car parking fees.  This will lead to more parking on residential roads. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs S B  Cl

157:  No to charges - (Resident) M O

158:  No to parking charges - (Resident) Miss B E  O

159:  No to parking charges - (Resident) Miss J W

160:  Object - (Resident) Mrs D & Miss S B

161: Object especially in the economic downturn.  Shop workers could not afford yearly fee.  Parents on school runs would not bother to "pop in".  Estate roads congested and noisy.  Why not charge at Hawkhurst - why penalise Cranbrook?  - (Resident) Mr & Mrs J V

162:  Object to pay car parking very strongly and make Cranbrook shopping very expensive - (Resident) H R W

163:  Obviously if we and others have to pay Cranbrook parking, we will desert with greater choice of shops, Cranbrook for Tenterden - (Resident) A H G

164:  One of the attractions of living here is the free parking.  It would seem a retrograde step in every way to have parking charges. - (Resident) Mrs D M  G

165:  One of the benefits of shopping in Cranbrook compared to other towns, is the free parking.  Without this people will go elsewhere to shop and trade will inevitably suffer. - (Resident) M T

166:  Oppose -   - (Resident) P W

167:  Oppose - (Resident) Mrs C J

168:  Oppose - no shortage of parking and will reduce visitor numbers - (Resident) D W

169:  Oppose car parking charges - (Resident) Barbara R

170:  Oppose car parking charges - (Resident) G B

171:  Oppose car parking charges - (Resident) K R  W

172:  Oppose car parking charges - (Resident) Mr J A  W

173:  Oppose car parking charges - (Resident) Pete L

174:  Oppose car parking charges - (Resident) S & R K

175:  Oppose Charging - (Resident) Mrs C S

176:  Oppose due to effects on residents and visitors - (Resident) H D

177:  Our family strongly oppose the proposal to introduce car parking charges. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs M G

178:  park free in Paddock Wood and Tenterden for 2 hours - would no longer visit Cranbrook - (Resident) Tim and S N

179:  Parking is great in Cranbrook and I will visit less if chargeable and try Whitstable - (Resident) D W  V

180: penalise residents as no off street parking, particularly for pensioners - we feel we are being bled dry  - (Resident) B and S S

181:  People will park in the roads and on the estates which will make it dangerous for children and OAPS.  Shops will lose customers. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs M

182:  People will shop on the internet driving shops out of business.  Other people will park in High Street and side roads causing congestion. - (Resident) Mr A D  W

183:  Please do not bring in parking charges. - (Resident) Mrs P D

184:  Please do not do it - end of a market town - (Resident) M J

185:  Please look carefully at empty shops and kill off shopping in Cranbrook.  Tesco will flourish.  Please think about it. - (Resident) R S

186:  Preposterous idea.  Your plan will make a unique town a ghost town, or turn it into a dull boring faceless chain store high street.  Please don't kill off our wonderful Cranbrook - (Resident) Mr & Mrs G

187: Push more people to park in High Street and cause more congestion.  Free parking draws customers to Cranbrook. - (Resident) R C

188:  Reduced trading in Cranbrook shops.  Congestion on the estates with people parking in side streets.  Residents will face fees or park on side roads. - (Resident) M A D

189:  Residents in High Street will be badly affected financially.  We can only park our cars outside our properties and it will affect the values and detrimental effect on the shops. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs C P A  F

190:  Revenue raising, not about a parking problem - Tax on those living in countryside - few bus services -danger to vibrant community. Car owners become disproportionate tax payers - (Resident) A B

191:  ridiculous and ill considered that threatens the economy of the town. Has ear marks of a short term revenue grab. - (Resident) J M

192:  Seriously damage  prosperity of town - (Resident)  A S

193:  Shop owners and residents will suffer - (Resident) S T

194:  Shoppers will go elsewhere.  The cars will be blocking the residential streets and residents will have nowhere to park.  Local shops will close with only the Co-op.  Is TWBC trying to close Cranbrook? - (Resident) I W

195:  Shops are struggling due to Tesco/Waitrose in Tenterden.  Rapid decline in lovely Kentish Town. - (Resident) C S

196:  Side streets would be congested, Free parking at Tesco in Tenterden, are commuters parking here rather than Staplehurst ? - (Resident) G M

197:  Strongly against charges, look at Tenterden.  Will congest High Street. - (Resident) C L

198:  Sufficient parking, so must be TWBC looking for a cash cow. Will cause demise of shops - (Resident) A F

199:  Support Parish Council - (Resident) A L

200:  support PC - (Resident) G P

Business Comments

1:  An Outrage. Reduction in footfall. Retailers will lose custom. Reduced income for workers. Parents will not pop into shops after dropping off children: C H  - (Business)

2:  Appalled by proposal. Drive custom away. Staff potential loss of 10% of income. Force people to park in residential streets: A D - (Business)

3:  Are you trying to make Cranbrook a ghost town?  With the charges, you will without doubt achieve that.  We would give serious consideration to relocating: Mr P R T - (Business)

4:  Drive up cost of shopping. Cause shops and businesses to close. Would cause less income for TWBC due to loss of business rates: A M - (Business)

5:  Business relies on customers stopping in town after dropping off children at local schools. Customers are stating they would visit less. Anticipated loss of 15%-20% which would put me out of business. Fearful for my livelihood: R L - (Business)

6:  Businesses already struggling with high overheads and competition from larger shopping centres. Parking charges another reason not to shop in Cranbrook: B M - (Business)

7:  Competition with surrounding larger towns. No Car park charges levels playing fields. Town relies on Independent traders. Seriously consider leaving Cranbrook if plan causes loss of profits. Anticipated loss of 15%: C W - (Business)

8:  Cranbrook has poor bus services, customers have to use their own cars. Free parking essential for encouraging customers to shop in town and not the larger surrounding towns: P M  - (Business)

9:  Currently employ sixty staff. Charges will have a detrimental effect on ability to manage business from Cranbrook. Staff not able to afford charges. Staff will leave and not be replaced. Anticipate leaving Cranbrook for good: M B - (Business)

10:  Dental Practice - I oppose proposed car parking charges: C S - (Business)

11:  Discourage person from attending Church Functions. Loss of business life and Tourist activity: P G - (Business)

12:  Employ five people. No car park facilities. Adverse effect on staff costs. Reduced profits. Staff parking in residential streets . Would appeal against Business Rate Review. : P B R  H - (Business)

13:  Free parking is excellent marketing tool for business in Cranbrook. Patients will go elsewhere. Increase in staff wages. Cost to be passed on to customers. Increased cost to customers. Business already struggling. Loss of business catastrophic for the town. Imposing an additional tax on those affected: S E- (Business)

14:  I am strongly opposed to car parking charges which must inevitably reduce the attractiveness of Cranbrook as a shopping venue: R P  C - (Business)

15:  In past financial year business suffered a 24% loss in turnover. Potential customers will go to larger surrounding towns. Will force retailers to close: A S - (Business)

16:  It will cause the death of Cranbrook Trade after difficult times all round:  S J - (Business)

17:  Madness! Many shops are at the tipping point now: M C - (Business)

18:  Major attraction for visitors is free parking - charging will seriously affect that traffic: G E - (Business)

19:  My wife and I are against the proposal to introduce car parking charges in Cranbrook and would certainly visit the town less: A B & Mrs J R - (Business)

20:  Negative impact on town. Free parking encourages tourist. Cranbrook lose competitive edge against nearby towns. Seven staff incurring extra costs. Cost to residents who need to park overnight in car parks: H P - (Business)

21:  our bookshop is 95% dependent on customers "walking in" and purchasing books off the shelf.  If they cannot gain access freely, they are likely to stay at home, use the internet and this shop will close: P S - (Business)

22:  Please rethink this proposal.  There is not an adequate bus service so people have to use their cars.  We have survived because of loyal, local shoppers. Cranbrook Sports: Mrs B A C - (Business)

23:  Red Cross Team oppose charges.  We are a team of workers who support disabled local people.  Charges would seriously impact on our disposable income: G T  S et al - (Business)

24:  Run a small B&B in Cranbrook with no parking facilities, parking charges devastating to our business-increasing tariff by 10%. Imposing parking charges on top of a fragile economy would be irrational and highly counterproductive: D G  - (Business)

25:  I oppose the introduction of parking charges: Mr J W - (Business)

26:  Small businesses in Cranbrook have to deal with the recession.  Residents in Cranbrook will begrudge paying and this will affect our businesses:  C  - (Business)

27:  Small shops are already struggling. Adverse effect economic vitality. Inadequate bus service to take people to other shopping areas. Hit tourism. Lack of parking for residents in town centre. Will alienate people towards TWBC: P A - (Business)

28:  Terrible impact on struggling town. Shops already empty. Charges will kill the footfall. Will destroy the town: Ms G P - (Business)

29:  This will kill struggling businesses. There are additional costs for staff which employers would have to pay: P G - (Business)

30:  Trade in Cranbrook reflects the decline of the worst economic downturn for 50 years.  We have more charity shops than ever before.  Shops have closed and others have reduced staff numbers and employment hours: R G  - (Business)

31:  We are a small business based in the High Street with 8 employees and I am extremely concerned that a daily car parking charge for people who work in Cranbrook but live outside the town would be devastating to their weekly salary which would be a knock on effect to the retailers who need the custom of office staff.  I strongly believe the council needs to support and retain small businesses in Cranbrook by keeping the parking 'FREE OF CHARGE.'  I do not wish to relocate my office or staff from Clermont House but if the proposal to charge goes ahead we may have no other choice: M J - (Business)

32:  We have 8 employees and parking charges would be devastating to their weekly salary.  I do not wish to relocate my business but will do so if  charges are introduced: SCS  - (Business)

33:  We totally oppose it, trade in Cranbrook is dying all this will make people stop shopping here: A C - (Business)

34:  Will damage business. Less footfall = Less profit = less staff required. Free parking has always been a plus for businesses and their customers. If supported by Borough Councillors I will never vote for them again: G C - (Business)

35:  Without doubt will have a huge impact on trade leaving empty shops: W G  - (Business)

36:  Worry that car parking charges will put pressure on private parking area. Problems with unauthorised parking causing problems for patients. Emergency vehicles may have problems attending. We strongly oppose this proposal: D H - (Business)

37:  We fully endorse the campaign; support the views of the Cranbrook's residents and local businesses who state that the local economy would suffer if the proposed charges were to be enforced.  - (School)

38:  It would lead to more car congestion around the surrounding roads.  - (School)

39:  it would discourage parents to park in car parks and walk to school - it would increase congestion  - (School)

More Residents' Comments

201: The charges will impact on shop workers, concert and church goers, charity workers, fund raisers festival, numbers of B & B visitors.  Our conservation area will be defaced by double yellow lines.  - (Resident)

202:  The cost incurred by having attendants at each of the car parks and expenses incurred by contacting non-payers would be far more than the revenue. Since most houses on the High Street do not have garages, this will cause chaos. - (Resident) P R

203:  The High Street is crucial to the continuation of Cranbrook as an "Independent" financial community.  It has existed on a knife edge for a number of years.  Charges would tip it over the edge. - (Resident) J P

204:  The present free parking is a great asset.  It works well.  Don't change it. - (Resident) Dr J & Mrs J H

205:  This  will undermine the economic prosperity of the town especially in an economic downturn. - (Resident) Mrs L H

206:  This is a really terrible idea - you don't have to kill Cranbrook as a town, so why do it? - (Resident) I H

207:  This is a retrograde step as the charges will damage business and tourism in the town by discouraging visitors. - (Resident) Mrs M L

208:  This is an additional taxation.  This will have a negative effect on Cranbrook. What tangible benefits will Cranbrook gain? - (Resident) Mr P C

209:  This is cynical exploitation by TWBC of a tax raising opportunity for TWBC.  We doubt whether the revenues will be spent in Cranbrook. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs M W

210:  This proposal would greatly harm Cranbrook.  The side roads would become congested with cars and financial hardship would affect residents who work and shop here. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs D K  C

211:  This scheme will make parking even more of a nightmare. It will force local people to abandon Cranbrook and use the towns where they can get all the shopping in one place - (Resident) Mr G & Mrs P R

212:  This will cause a loss of trade in shops and businesses and congestion in side roads and it will deter visitors. - (Resident) J W D

213:  This will cripple local businesses.  Cars will park on residential streets or Co-op supermarket site - (Resident) P R

214:  This will deter visitors and shoppers from visiting the town and spoil what has been a pleasant outing without having to hunt for change. - (Resident) Mrs P F

215:  This will have a devastating effect on all businesses who in these harsh economic times do not need added obstacles. - (Resident) Mrs C K

216: This will have a devastating effect on all Cranbrook businesses and lead to a significant disadvantage to residents.  - (Resident) Mr D K

217:  This would be a very retrograde step.  It would have an adverse effect on traders.  Customers could well prefer to go to other centres such as Tenterden. - (Resident) S B

218:  This would be disastrous for the town.  It would deter people from visiting to shop and clog up all the residential roads, with people trying to find a free parking space. - (Resident) S M

219:  This would make me even more likely to shop at Paddock Wood. - (Resident) C M  J

220:  Totally against - (Resident) S H

221:  totally against proposal - (Resident) J W

222: Totally oppose charges.  I work part-time in Cranbrook 6 hours a day on low wages.  Charges are not financially viable would seriously consider my employment will kill off the High Street. - (Resident) C G

223:  Totally opposed - will kill Cranbrook. - (Resident) Mr P K

224:  Totally opposed - will kill Cranbrook. - (Resident) Ms J B

225:  Totally opposed - yet another method of extracting money from hard pressed individuals and businesses.  - (Resident) G M

226:  Totally opposed and wish to lodge our objections.  Poor local transport means car is essential.  TWBC's only interest appears to be financial gain with scant regard for this great rural community. - (Resident) Mr J & Mrs J B

227:  Totally opposed to the proposal to introduce car parking charges.  Part of the charm of this small town is free parking enabling easy regular daily/weekly visits to the town.  Less likely to shop here. - (Resident) Mrs N R

228:  Totally opposed.  Cranbrook a beautiful town for visiting tourists.  Time to wander & browse after essential shopping unlike Tenterden. Do we need more stress in our lives? - (Resident) Mr & Mrs S B  C

229:  Town will lose its vibrancy and appeal to visitors.  I will take my regular calls elsewhere.  Closures will progressively kill the High Street. - (Resident) R W

230:  Trade will be affected, shops close and communities become isolated - (Resident) G H

231:  Trading as V.Chic.  My customers say free parking is a unique attraction of Cranbrook.  Charges would make my overheads even higher and shops will leave the town. - (Resident) Mrs J M

232:  Traffic is excessive in Oatfield Drive and charges will increase traffic and be a danger to many children who use the schools in the area. - (Resident) J D  B

233:  TWBC want £812K from Cranbrook, is this to build their tram system? We feel our assets are being sold off - (Resident) Peter O

234:  undemocratic approach - charges unsupportable, side street parking - (Resident) M L

235:  Very bad idea.  Would not help much needed commercial activity and spoil the busy-ness of the town. - (Resident) S H

236:  Very negative proposal.  1: It will increase parking in residential areas. 2: Lead to loss of trade, with proposal for a Tesco in Staplehurst. - (Resident) Mr R B

237:  Very opposed - (Resident) A I

238:  Very underhand - (Resident)  L

239:  Visitors would park in adjoining convenient residential roads causing great inconvenience.  This would be a prelude to more blight being inflicted on a Kentish Town business. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs R

240:  Waive the parking fee or wave goodbye to a thriving community. - (Resident) Mr J & Mrs B P

241: We are against charges.  It will cause traffic jams in the side streets.  Cranbrook is unique for not charging which encourages visitors. - (Resident) Mr R & Mrs S A

242:  We are fortunate to have free parking.  Where would office/shop assistants park?  In side streets?  More shops would close.  Who will benefit?  Not Cranbrook - (Resident) L S

243:  We are opposed as most cars will park on the Wheatfield Estate causing problems for our driveways.  Danger to children and old people crossing the road not being able to see and it will affect trade.  - (Resident) Mr & Mrs M

244:  We are opposed to car parking charges.  There are already too many empty shops.  People will increasingly shop online and not come to town.  The Council Tax we pay should cover maintenance. - (Resident) Mr M & Mrs P A

245:  We are planning to run this property as a holiday cottage and are totally opposed to the car parking charges   - (Resident) M & L D

246:  We are totally against this proposal.  It would mean less people coming to shop in Cranbrook and as a result shops closing down. - (Resident) Mr C & Mrs S A

247:  We are totally opposed to this proposal if implemented.  It is bound to cause hardship both to local traders and to shoppers like ourselves. - (Resident) M & P R

248:  We are utterly opposed.  Traders are suffering now in Cranbrook.  It will be the end of many of them if the proposal goes ahead. - (Resident) Mr R & Mrs J M

249: We both oppose this proposal and are concerned that it took so long to bring it to the Parish Council's attention.  The status quo is better for trade and residents - (Resident) C A & P B S

250:  We come to Cranbrook often and totally agreed with Parish Council decision.  Traders will be the ones who suffer. - (Resident) K & L S

251: We do feel that this will be suicide for many businesses.  Surely having shops closing would create a greater loss than no revenue from our car parks  - (Resident) S & P F

252:  We feel any charges would be detrimental to the town. - (Resident) Mrs P & Mr D B

253:  We feel persecuted. Councillors do not understand Cranbrook as the centre will die along with the business rates. Free parking draws shoppers - (Resident) A R

254:  We feel that  car parking charges would mean a lot of people would shop elsewhere. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs T D

255: We foresee damaging consequences of this proposal for whole community and this heritage town Church, windmill, museum, library, Vestry Hall have no private car parks.  Impact on Sunday services and severely affect the voluntary and charitable sectors. - (Resident) T A

256:  We frequently use the car parks in Cranbrook.  Therefore we are vehemently opposed to the proposed charges. - (Resident) K & V R

257:  we have enough empty shops already - people won’t be able to work here and residents will feel they have been robbed. - (Resident) D L

258:  We live between Cranbrook and Tenterden and use Cranbrook shops, library, leisure and bowls club.  It will affect our choice of shopping areas. - (Resident) Mr D & Mrs L B

259:  We object to the introduction of charges for the car parks. - (Resident) Mr R & Mrs J H

260: We often shop in Co-op and visit charity shops.  If have to pay we would not go to Cranbrook shops.  We belong to Cranbrook Bowls Club and paying for half a day is too expensive and re-think our membership.  - (Resident) K C

261:  We oppose charges. - (Resident) Mr MJ & Mrs MR G

262:  We oppose charging. - (Resident) Mr C P & Mrs B D

263:  We oppose the proposal to car park charges in Cranbrook. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs C G

264:  We oppose these charges which should be kept to a minimum with allowances for those working and living in Cranbrook.  What is extra cost of collection compared to income received? - (Resident) Mr & Mrs D A  W

265:  we pay council tax already, services decline. Just raises my daily cost of living. What about staff cuts and internal savings ? - (Resident) J A

266:  We say no to car parking charges.  It would not be good for trade and not for us pensioners who rely on our cars to shop. - (Resident) C & H H

267:  We strongly oppose these charges.  They will definitely discourage us from using Cranbrook as our local shopping centre. - (Resident) H & N R

268:  We think it is outrageous to charge for something in public ownership.  We boycott Headcorn now due to parking charges.  It will limit social activity in rural areas. - (Resident) D B

269:  We totally oppose the proposal.  Town is already suffering.  Since Headcorn introduced charging we no longer shop there.  We will be forced to reduce our visits.  TWBC is loading more charges on local people. - (Resident) Mrs S & Mr C B

270:  We value free parking.  If Council property generates income, reduce the precept and benefit public transport.  We hope the Co-op would provide a refund for 1 hour. - (Resident) Mr & Mrs P M

271: We would shop in Tenterden.  It will kill Cranbrook already struggling though it may help Budgens at Hawkhurst.  - (Resident) Mr & Mrs R B

272:  What an absolute disaster.  Businesses are already struggling.  We need to encourage not discourage. - (Resident) Mrs J B

273:  What will happen to the residents of Tanyard car park? We were assured we would be given a permit and parking allocation.  This could be the final straw for struggling shop keepers. - (Resident) Mrs V W

274:  When this was suggested years ago, it was found that the cost of installation and running the system was not viable.  What has changed? Is it the Councillors' yearly expenses allowance? - (Resident) Mrs J P

275:  where will money go - we are low maintenance - (Resident) H K

276:  Will deter shoppers, another tax on retail staff, who will benefit from the money - (Resident) I K

277:  Will deter visitors  and harm business - (Resident) D and C R

278: Will income be more than cost ? Street parking more difficult, other supermarkets  have free parking so coop will be affected - (Resident) C C

279:  will kill Cranbrook, will affect business of every kind - (Resident) E K

280:  Will shop farther afield, so local shops viability will be compromised - (Resident) C W

Would not shop in High Street.  Small shops would die and Cranbrook Town Centre. I am a pensioner.  - (Resident) T S